
Have you heard the one about three dentists and a psychiatrist walk into… an OCR investigation? OCR has announced their first set of enforcement actions of 2022, and just in time for our 350th episode. These OCR cases involve patient right of access and improper disclosure violations.
In this episode:
4 OCR Cases For Us – Ep 350
Today’s Episode is brought to you by:
Kardon
and
HIPAA for MSPs with Security First IT
Subscribe on Apple Podcast. Share us on Social Media. Rate us wherever you find the opportunity.
The Privacy and Security Boot Camp
3.5 day In Person Event
Sep 12, 13, 14 and 15
PriSecBootCamp.com
Great idea! Share Help Me With HIPAA with one person this week!
Learn about offerings from the Kardon Club
and HIPAA for MSPs!
Thanks to our donors. We appreciate your support!
If you would like to donate to the cause you can do that at HelpMeWithHIPAA.com
Like us and leave a review on our Facebook page: www.Facebook.com/HelpMeWithHIPAA
If you see a couple of numbers on the left side you can click that and go directly to that part of the audio. Get the best of both worlds from the show notes to the audio and back!
HIPAA Say What!?!
[03:25] Two things to point out:- HIPAA does apply to dentists if they file electronic claims. We will get to that as our main topic of this podcast episode in a minute.
- When you leave a job HIPAA protections continue to apply to any information you learned as a result of your employment with a CE or BA. Forget you ever saw those details, ever. Any time you learn information in your personal life that would be considered PHI at work technically HIPAA protections do not apply to that information. However, most people expect a higher level of trust from those in the healthcare system.
405(d) Tip of the Week
[07:41] Check out the webinars included as part of the Spotlight Series on the 405d.hhs.gov website.The 405d Spotlight Series shines a light on various cyber-related topics with an industry member at the heart of the discussion. The webinars are a forum to learn from industry members about the current landscape in cybersecurity and the threats facing the sector.
- April 2021 Webinar – Monitoring and Responding to Cyber Threats
- June 2021 Webinar – The Internet of Medical Things: Making Them Secure
- August 2021 Webinar – Healthcare’s Enterprise Cyber Risk Management
- October 2021 Webinar – A Case Study of “Cancer Care in the Wake of a Cyber Attack”
- December 2021 Webinar – 2021 Cyber Threat Review
This comes out on Apr 8th so you have time to sign up for the next one! It will be on Wednesday, Apr 13 2022 [1:00] PM – [2:00] PM. CISA and 405(d) Fireside Chat! Learn about taking advantage of the CyHy resources available to critical infrastructure entities for free.
4 OCR Cases For Us
[12:56] 3 dentists and a psychiatrist walk intoThis is the first announcement of enforcement actions in 2022.
Four HIPAA Enforcement Actions Hold Healthcare Providers Accountable With Compliance | HHS.gov
So two of these are patient right of access issues and two are improper disclosures issues.
Northcutt Dental, Fairhope, Alabama – Improper Disclosure – $62,500 and a 2 year CAP
On April 30, 2018, Northcutt Dental sent an email communication to its patients regarding Dr. Northcutt’s campaign. The email header showed the email as coming from “Northcutt Dental” and the email message was signed “Sincerely, Northcutt Dental.” Northcutt Dental used a third-party marketing company, Solutionreach, to send the emails. The campaign email was sent to the same patients that received the mailed letter in July 2017 plus an additional 1,727 patients, for a total of 5,385 individual recipients.
Here are the four violations cited in the Resolution Agreement:
- Northcutt Dental impermissibly disclosed the name and address of 3,658 individual patients when it shared this information with Dr. Northcutt’s Campaign Manager in 2017.
- Northcutt Dental impermissibly disclosed the name and email address of 5,385 individuals in 2018 when it shared this information with its marketing vendor for purposes outside the service arrangement in place.
- Northcutt Dental did not designate a privacy official until November 14, 2017.
- Northcutt Dental did not implement policies and procedures to comply with the requirements of the Privacy and Breach Notification Rules until January 1, 2018.
Following the timeline here tells its own story.
As a result, OCR’s settlement with Northcutt Dental was for $62, 500 and a two year corrective action plan. The settlement includes some very specific details about policies and procedures, security risk analysis, all the things we’re used to seeing in a two year corrective action plan to build a proper privacy and security program.
[23:14]Dr. U. Phillip Igbinadolor, D.M.D. & Associates, P.A. (UPI), Charlotte, NC – Improper Disclosure – $50,000 CMP
Ultimately, OCR imposed a $50,000 civil money penalty against
Based on the information in the Notice of Proposed Determination, the practice failed to provide some of the information as requested by OCR (such as their social media policy re: uses and disclosures and financial information) and at one point said “I will see you in court.”
This situation is why we say that you have to have a social media policy that covers multiple things. What are you going to do when there’s a review? Who gets to control what’s posted on your website? How do you respond on your social media pages? And, what is it that can employees say about patience or work on their social media pages?
[31:29]Dr. Donald Brockley, D.D.M., Butler, Pennsylvania – Right of Access – $30,000 Immediate CAP
Here is a timeline of events:
- August 2019 the practice received a notice that they were in violation of Privacy Rule’s Right of Access provision.
- Nov 3, 2020 HHS notified them of a CMP of $104,000
- January 25, 2021 they requested a hearing with a HHS Administrative Law Judge.
- October 8, 2021 a joint motion for a stay was granted because they were going to settle the matter with OCR.
- The practice agreed to pay $30,000 to OCR and commit to update their Right of Access policies and procedures and train the staff by Dec 9, 2021.
We’ve talked about this before, don’t ignore OCR. It’s possible that if the practice had responded to them and showed remorse and that they were trying to fix the situation, that they’d not have to pay anything. But now, they’ve made OCR jump through all these hoops. Let’s hope this practice doesn’t cross OCR’s desk in the future, because if they do and they can’t prove they are following the law things will not go very well for them.
[36:54]Jacob & Associates, California – Right of Access – $28,000 and 2 year CAP
HHS’ investigation revealed that Complainant most recently submitted a mailed written access request on July 1, 2018 for the records and did not receive a response. Complainant resubmitted the request by facsimile and Jacob & Associates provided Complainant a complete copy of her medical records (11 pages) on May 16, 2019, by electronic mail, as requested, after requiring her to travel to its office to complete its form to exercise her right to access, imposing a flat fee that was not cost-based ($25 per medical records request), and initially providing an incomplete (one page) paper copy of the records. Further, Jacob & Associates has not designated a privacy official and its Notice of Privacy Practices lacks required content.
The practice did so much wrong here. We’ve had several discussions in previous podcasts about a patient’s right to access their medical records and how to calculate fees for providing them. This has been in the Privacy Rule since its inception.
The practice agreed to take corrective actions and pay OCR $28,000 to settle potential violations of the HIPAA Privacy Rule.
It was nice of OCR to give us their announcement of the first big enforcement actions of 2022 for our 350th podcast episode. These announcements always give us insight to what OCR is looking for and not looking for. There is always something to learn from them.
Remember to follow us and share us on your favorite social media site. Rate us on your podcasting apps, we need your help to keep spreading the word. As always, send in your questions and ideas!
HIPAA is not about compliance,
it’s about patient care.TM
Special thanks to our sponsors Security First IT and Kardon.



